@nukeador
Yes, thatâs it.
Why it canât show this in every reply? When the user explicitly click on the âdirect reply to a specific postâ instead of click on âthe very last reply at the bottomâ to only reply to the thread in general.
Somehow the âbehaviorâ of the forum concerning this issue has improved since I has started this thread. (Why that? Maybe you can tell me that. I donât know.)
Now there are only some posts that are excluded. I think that should be fixed too.
Thank you in advance
I donât really know why it wasnât working and itâs working on this one. From my understanding, you wonât get the âin-reply-toâ only in the two situations I commented (reply is just below or you reply to the original message)
I use the forums in mailing list mode, reading them in Evolution which is an Outlook type application. I am sure many of us are faimliar with Outlook in our non-FOSS dayjobs.
Evolution and Outlook both display a tree like view where I can easily see who has responded to who.
I have never been a fan of forums as they basically show everthing in chronological order. It would be nice if the forums would replicate this standard mailing list feature.
Hmm yeah I agree it would be good to distinguish if a post is a reply to the original first post, or to the post just above it. Is it possible to enable this?
Another bug related to this issue: If you are writing a reply to the most recent post and someone else ( not @SomeoneElse ⊠I mean any other someone else ⊠) happens to squeeze in another reply before you finished your own, you end up being cut off from the post you replied to.
Happened to me already 2 times and the only workaround apparently is to edit your post and insert a â@xxxâ on top of your post to indicate the user you replied to.
Generally I do not see any reason at all why the link to the post you replied to should not be fixed to your reply in any case, notwithstanding if you replied to the OP or the most recent post or any other one. The link does not cost any extra money and is does not make any sense to omit it in one ore the other case.