I want to toss in another vote against using the “amenity” key, as that ideally should be for things that are relevant for tourists, or at least useful to the public, which these small warehouses very much are not.
office=delivery
seems fine to me and may make people happy as it is likely to render
Though I would want to consult with native speakers is it mangling meaning of office…
I am fine with amenity=delivery_depot
(I am also fine with amenity=prison
etc.)
technically being able to get something quickly on demand can be considered useful and you need some form of distribution points to achieve that…
And yes, I am not a fan of using shop=outpost
for places where only employees* can enter.
Though not sure how it is on range from “I am unhappy about such redefinition” to “I want to hide that redefinition happened and tag is in general used in this way”.
(OSM Wiki is descriptive, not prescriptive and in case that overwhelming use is a bad idea/mismatches something - well, it should be documented even if such tagging is sad and bad)
*to be specific: people employed without official contracts via delivery app are counted as employees here, irregardless what legal department of company employing them prefers.
Marking delivery distribution point with
amenity=fast_food
withdelivery=only
takeaway=no
is about as trolltag as tagging prison astourism=hostel involuntary=yes
in the case of pizza, it is not just a “delivery distribution point” but also a kitchen / small production facility (it is a service, not industrial)
| JesseFTW
July 19 |
- | - |
I want to toss in another vote against using the “amenity” key, as that ideally should be for things that are relevant for tourists, or at least useful to the public, which these small warehouses very much are not.
amenity is not specifically related to tourism, these places here are amenities for the people living around. We even have prisons under the amenity key. I like the proposed amenity=delivery_depot
It’s a warehouse. It’s not a shop. Therefore it should be tagged as a warehouse and not a shop. I’m honestly struggling to see what the difficulty is here.
Hm, I think
industrial=warehouse
or=logistics
is out of the picture. It is documented as a subtag of landuse=industrial which would be something very different.
Why? If I order some furniture online it comes from a warehouse which will be tagged as a warehouse. If I order a book online it comes from a warehouse. If I order my supermarket shopping online it comes from a warehouse. Why is Getir somehow different to Ocado?
Agreed. It doesn’t matter if it is for tourists or local public. But the common think is that amenity is intended for general public. If only employees/contractors could (or would want to) visit such a place, then it does not fit under amenity=*
in my opinion.
Why? If I order some furniture online it comes from a warehouse which will be tagged as a warehouse. If I order a book online it comes from a warehouse. If I order my supermarket shopping online it comes from a warehouse. Why is Getir somehow different to Ocado?
the specifics are different, we also distinguish waste baskets from waster containers and recycling centres. This shop is now a getir, it has nothing to do with an industrial warehouse, peeking through the door, it looks almost like a regular convenience store in the inside
the warehouse that delivers to this distribution point is likely a warehouse, although logistics are not really industrial, they are commercial operations (tertiary sector)
I didn’t say “an industrial warehouse”, I said “a warehouse”.
The fact that the OSM tag for a warehouse is industrial=warehouse
isn’t really an issue. The OSM tag for an emergency access point is highway=emergency_access_point
even though an emergency access point isn’t a highway. And so on.
Its function is as a warehouse. It does exactly the same as an Ocado warehouse does: you order online, the workers pick the food off the shelves, it then gets loaded onto a truck or a motorbike or something and delievred to you. You can’t visit in person. End of.
If you want to tag the fact that the building’s external appearance is like a shop, then use the building=
tag for that. But what it is is a warehouse.
The Dutch community had a discussion about dark stores a few months back: Dark stores
The consensus of that discussion is to use amenity=warehouse
and that they are not shops since you cannot visit them as a customer.
I think so too.
Sure, there are big warehouses (industrial=warehouse
) inside big industrial areas (landuse=industrial
). But there are also small warehouses (the ones being discussed here), often in the middle of residential areas (landuse=residential
).
Just like there are huge supermarket shops (shop=supermarket
) in retail commercial areas (landuse=retail
) or malls, but there are also small convenience shops (shop=convenience
) also often in the middle of residential areas (landuse=residential
)
I’m honestly struggling to see what the difficulty is here.
The core of that issue (as I understand it) seems to be that some people think we should tag small and big warehouses differently, even in cases when they behave mostly the same (just like we differ on shop=supermarket
vs. shop=convenience
).
We discussed this tag but decided it was unsuitable since these are simply not industrial. That’s another reason why amenity=warehouse
was invented.
from outside they kind of look like shop, often are in places where shop used to be and sometimes pretend to be shops for legal purposes, and are support infrastructure for something replacing shops
so I am not highly confused by confusion here
(though they are not a shop)
Some cities in NL are already taking action to move dark stores outside their retail zones because the dark stores tend to turn welcoming city centres into some sort of social dead zones.
Then perhaps we are not talking about the same thing (sorry I have no idea what “getir” is)? The ones I’ve seen (not that you are really permitted to peek in, as it is “personnel only”) look like a big storage room (i.e. warehouse), and not like a convenience store. There are no cashiers, no checkouts, no self-service nor sellers, can’t use your cash or credit card or bitcoin there, in fact, you cannot even enter the place (legally). So definitely nothing like “a regular convenience store”.
For the ones where you (as a member of general public) can enter and pickup stuff you’ve bought online (instead of paying extra for delivery), and have a person with whom a member of a general public can interact to get the stuff they ordered online - we already have a tag in use for that, which I mentioned before (shop=outpost
) - do you agree on that one?
You can see this differently, either say who cares, it’s OpenStreetMap tagging and there are other tags with weird semantics as well, I’ll add industrial=warehouse to any kind of warehouse, and will ignore the wiki which says the tag requires landuse=industrial and in general the industrial key requires one of landuse=industrial or man_made=works or usage=industrial with railway=*
Or you can acknowledge that there are different types of warehouses, and industrial=warehouse is for land predominantly used with industrial warehouses.
Actually, only warehouses which are related to a production facility are “industrial” (secondary sector), most or a significant part of warehouses are for distribution, import/export, wholesale, customs, logistics and more, and belong to the tertiary sector.
using industrial=warehouse for these small distribution points in stores in residential areas would be like using highway=emergency_access_point for access points you can only reach by boat.
then maybe I did not express myself correctly, indeed you may not enter the place, there are no cashiers, no checkouts and you cannot pay there. I looks similar to a regular convenience store as they have shelves with goods, and the staff walks around with baskets and put things inside. The spacing between the shelves, the type of shelves and the goods are like a convenience store / small supermarket, maybe slightly narrower space. Hope this clarifies.
Well, that was not much of an improvement then, was it? It is not an amenity either (i.e. members of general public would not seek it out; much like they would not seek amenity=wastewater_plant
were one inclined to mistag it as such).
So, replacing one, ah, sub-ideal key (industrial
) with another sub-ideal key (amenity
) is not progress IMHO (especially as any change by itself has a lot of negative impacts, which it should at least offset, and better additionally improve on)
So, if new key was sought because industrial=warehouse
was found too confusing (how confusing are then tags like shop=hairdresser
? Which goods exactly is one exchanging for money there?), I’d rather suggest something like commercial=warehouse
instead of abusing amenity=*
(which is somewhat overused anyway, even if the tag would fit there, which it doesn’t).
But, as noted earlier, I personally think that such attempts at renaming shop=hairdresser
, highway=emergency_access_point
, or industrial=warehouse
are likely more problematic then beneficial. So I’d rather prefer to document existing usage (which is that big and small warehouses alike are tagged with only key we have for them, industrial=warehouse
). But if it is a must to rename them, please let’s discuss and find more reasonable key (like mentioned commercial=warehouse
; which is hopefully much less controversial, although I believe that someone will manage to find examples of non-commercial warehouses)
how confusing are then tags like
shop=hairdresser
? Which goods exactly is one exchanging for money there?)
shop says it is for places selling goods or services.
Well, that was not much of an improvement then, was it? It is not an amenity either
We know that, but it was considered the least bad choice out of all main (top-level) keys. At least it was not yet in use for other types of places, unlike building=warehouse
which is strictly for buildings and industrial=warehouse
which is strictly for industrial places.
So, if new key was sought because
industrial=warehouse
was found too confusing (how confusing are then tags likeshop=hairdresser
?
I also think that places that only offer services and no goods should be retagged from shop to something else, but that’s another topic for which you’re free to start another thread.
I’d rather prefer to document existing usage (which is that big and small warehouses alike are tagged with only key we have for them,
industrial=warehouse
).
Is that how industrial=warehouse is used? Do you have examples?
Also, amenity=warehouse is a tag that is used for this.
more reasonable key (like mentioned
commercial=warehouse
The commercial=*
key is currently completely undocumented, which does not help in the slightest.
then maybe I did not express myself correctly, indeed you may not enter the place, there are no cashiers, no checkouts and you cannot pay there. I looks similar to a regular convenience store as they have shelves with goods, and the staff walks around with baskets and put things inside. The spacing between the shelves, the type of shelves and the goods are like a convenience store / small supermarket, maybe slightly narrower space. Hope this clarifies.
I think I see what you mean to say. But in that way, postoffice and warehouse and supermarket and library all “look the same”.
But surely, that is because “having shelves” is a nature of anything having goods stored economically (I mean, without shelves, one would have much less storage space!) and the width of the “aisles” is also kept minimal as possible to still have the same utility, but maximize storage space.
My point is that we should tag them according to their function, not about their similar looks.
Also intersting points about looks (from the outside) - industrial warehouses may often additionally be tagged as building=warehouse
, while that would practically never be the case for small ones in the city (most of which would be building=apartments
or maybe building=retail
- because their outside architectural style if not that of warehouse; even if their function is – but we have building:use=warehouse for tagging that)