There are some rough edges, indeed. However, I think all of them are minor, “recoverable,” and seem to be being brought to the attention of the administrators at a pace that doesn’t seem to overwhelm them, despite there remaining some “minor, recoverable…” problems.
I give rather high marks to the teams behind this forum, despite some rough edges. I’ll say solid-A or A-, (not quite an A+) if I were a professor of Discourse 3.0 for OSM (which I am not). And that is respectable, so I have respect. It’s a remarkable achievement and seems to be “growing on us” as a worldwide project: good for us.