I am adding all the missing crossing in an area and after reading key definitions, the guidance on crossings and quarterly project last year.
I thought I will do a fairly detailed tagging that includes kerbs as footway barriers. I am also in process of adding the footways even when they run along the road so explicit barrier will be helpful especially that the presence of tactile paving and raising/lowering of kerbs on formal and informal crossing is rather inconsistent in this area.
Here’s a recent changeset which demonstrates this. Could I ask for feedback on this? I was pretty confident in this scheme, but I now read the guidance on tagging kerb=raised and it seems there’s controversy. The matter is further complicated by my dual use of StreetComplete and Vespuci which all have questions and presets that if applied will be probably result in highly redundant tagging.