Usage of highway=living_street + service=alley in residential areas

Hey Russ,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

First, let’s address the facts:

  1. The Thai wiki guidelines for service=alley align 100% with the global wiki, without deviation. You can review it here.

  2. A review of the global service=alley wiki changes since 2010 reveals no mention permitting the general use of the service=alley tag for narrow roads.

In 2013, an exception was introduced for medieval European settlements, focusing on “very narrow streets running between buildings, providing public through-access.” This scenario is specific and irrelevant to urban and rural settlements in Thailand. Further details are available here.

  1. Routers recognize lanes=1, and using highway=residential + lanes=1 has been acknowledged as a valid approach for routing. Additional information can be found here.

We can certainly reconsider borderline cases and examine mapping practices for adopting a different tagging approach for roads narrower than, for instance, 3 meters.

However, for the typical residential roads with a width of 3 meters or more, as you described above and approved below in Facebook a few days ago, I doubt you will find many “supporters.”


Anyway, I’ll open it up to the global community to decide on the best approach and will share the results here.