Quero primeiro saber o que acham por aqui, conversando em fluido português. Depois vou aos desenvolvedores do Mapillary e, por fim, à lista Tagging. Se quando chegar o momento alguém quiser ser meu intérprete, agradeço.
I am an enthusiastic mapillary user, too. From what I understand from Alexandre’s post (sorry, I learned only latin in school and have to guess ) I very much love the idea to tag a link to mapillary! And I think that “source” might be the right tag for some occasions, but not in general. E.g. the source of a building may be Bing, but I like to also post a link to mapillary.
So I am in favour to add a specific mapillary tag, but I do not really see the necessity for 3 IDs. I think that mapillary stores the mapping between image ID and sequence, and to the profile, too. If I e.g. follow the link http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xX-eSeUqrTzMkc-3T2gq6w I can flip through the sequence and see the contributor, too.
Welcome Kay! I think your Latin got the Portuguese pretty right.
Perhaps the best place to discuss this is the tagging mailing list, not here. I agree with jgpacker that tagging the changeset and not the elements is better. I also believe that a simple source=mapillary is more than enough since people can still check Mapillary at the same location and find the relevant image (or even a collection of related images that together contain the full information about the geometric element). Say, for instance, that one means that “the driveways inside this soccer stadium were mapped using several Mapillary pictures”. It would be very difficult to capture all the details in a single picture, so multiple Mapillary images would need to be referenced for a single driveway, and this might be cumbersome, both for the mapper and for someone checking the mapper’s work.
Sorry my friends, I did not want to hijack your discussion and switch to English, please continue in português.
Alexandre, you are completely right, it makes perfect sense to have different options. Sorry I missed that point.
Fernando, in my example I wanted to outline that I wished not only to document my mapping (for that the source tag would be the right choice), but more than that help someone to look at the (in my example) vending machine because it is unusual and difficult to describe by tagging. I see it more as a “see also” link on a map.
Sunny greetings (ok, the moon is already there) from Würzburg