I’m sorry to revive an old topic, but I came across a situation that the current wiki page does not seem to cover, and I’d like your opinion on it so hopefully it can be clarified on the wiki:
(It is similar to Case 3 listed by @willkmis in this post of the original discussion, but I couldn’t notice a consensus in the discussion in response to that particular case.)
In cases like the above, where the sidewalk continues seamlessly into the driveway, with the same surface, it seems that neither crossing:continuous=yes nor crossing:continuous=no applies — or, in other words, neither the sidewalk, nor the driveway is more prominent in the crossing. In fact, it appears as if there isn’t a crossing at all, but instead more of a coexistence zone?
I’m not sure. Open to suggestions! 