Looks like a good proposal, Brazil. I am not the facilitator of these requests but I thought you might want to list the fellow group members here.
Also a word of wisdom: Some of my DWG colleagues wished to remain off the user group on the forum when we set that up. You may want to get each member’s concurrence. Their impacts of being a member mean:
They’ll get a notification when someone tags that anywhere
They can optionally add the title to the forum avatar (see mine)
People can message you on the group. If some are not members this can create a minor conversational gap.
Who should be the group owner(s)? These should be one or more CWG members who would be responsible for adding or removing members from the forum group when people join or leave CWG.
I’ve created @osmf-cwg just now. As group owners, you and Mikel should be able to update the group’s settings, tweak the presentation and description to your liking and add the remaining members.
At the moment, I haven’t enabled the ability to send direct messages to the group yet. You can enable it, but if you choose to do so, you should be prepared to respond if community members approach you through that channel.
I’ll review the group settings, update the description, and work with Mikel to adjust the presentation to reflect our goals. We’ll also start adding the remaining CWG members shortly.
Regarding direct messaging: I appreciate the heads-up. I’ll discuss it with Mikel and the team first, and we’ll decide whether or not to enable it based on our availability to respond actively.