Hi, sorry for using English. I was browsing trees with weird height/circumference ratios and stumbled upon the 2015 Linz tree import. It seems like a lot of trees with a circumference of 0.01 were added. I think they are likely to be errors because:
For example there are 7m tall Carpinus betulus in Linz with 0.01 circumference, in the rest of the world the average circumference for a 7m Carpinus betulus is around 0.48.
I also checked some in streetview imagery and they look wrong, you can see this one on Mapillary for example: link.
Or check the tree row in Harrachstraße for example, the trees appear to be all similar (likely planted at the same time as most tree rows) but the first four trees on the left are 0.01 while the rest of them are >1m, despite having the same height.
94% of circumference=0.01 values in the whole OSM database are all in Linz.
I don’t know deutsch to browse into the import documentation to understand what happened. Maybe 0.01 was a wildcard value meant to identify trees with unsurveyed/unknown circumference? Maybe an error in the original data or in the import process? Is there a way to understand and fix this error?