No habría pensado que ninguno de los dos fuera clasificado como Parque, pero estoy consultando con todos vosotros para confirmar si estas son prácticas normales en España?
Gracias
Graeme Fitzpatrick
Grupo de Trabajo de Datos OSMF
We have received a complaint concerning a number of parks being deleted in the Madrid area, and they have then been remapped.
I wouldn’t have thought that either of them would be classified as a Park, but I’m checking with you all to confirm if these are normal practices in Spain?
Parks are public. Grass or garden areas with swimming pools and playgrounds inside residential areas that are not open to the public are not parks.
Neither the way 1208153193 nor the way 1208152988 are parks. The first one is a residential area (private area with grass, swimming pool, etc.). The second one could be tagged as «landuse=residential», but not «leisure=park».
They are private areas. You can check it in aerial images and street views available. They are the private interior zones of a residential area for the exclusive use of the neighbors. Something very common.
I know that this is more or less resolved, but I wanted to confirm you that those are private spaces. I live nearby and have passed a lot of times nearby.
My suggestion is to change the labels to the appropriate ones and remove building parts inside (as inner parts). Lets see if @VisionArmour fix it as in the blocking note he/she were told.