Natura 2000 : specification of classifications

General talk Tagging general discussion
1

—English (French version below)—

Hi,

After a small discuss on French forum, we observe that borders of a natura 2000 reserve depend of the reglementation. I mean that the “Birds directive” border of a reserve can be different of the “Habitats Directive” border of the same reserve. And that’s an issue because it crates several OSM objects with same tags.
In the way to solve this issue, I propose this:

Add to each border of each natura 2000 one of these following tag depending of the specification of the border.

What do you think about it ?

—Français—

Bonjour,

Après une petite discussion sur le forum francophone, nous avons observé que les limites des Zones Natura 2000 dépendent de la rêglementation. Je veux dire que les frontières de la zone “Directive Oiseaux” d’une natura 2000 peut être différente de la zone “Directive Habitats” de la même natura 2000. C’est une problème car cela créé plusieurs objets OSM avec les mêmes tags.
Dans l’objectif de résoudre ce problème, je propose cela :

Ajouter à chacune des zone de chaque natura 2000 un de ces tags (voir liste ci-dessus) en fonction de la règlementation représentée par la frontière.

Qu’en pensez-vous ?

2

Here are the missing links, due to the rules for new persons on the forum.

3

Doesn’t this overlap protection_title? e.g. natura2000=SPA = protection_title=Special Protection Area ecc.

1 Like
4

Key:related_law - OpenStreetMap Wiki also exists for a pretty similar purpose

1 Like
5

I dont think. Here it should be protection_title=natura_2000.

6

I see more this tag an aditional tag. But there is 27000 natural 2000 (multiplied by the different rules) across europe, so related_law dont simplify the mapping of natura 2000.

7

Or protection_title=Special Protection Area + ref:natura2000=*, I see this tag has some uses.

8

From my point of view, you should rather check, which current schemas exists in OSM to map a protected area and then figure out how those Natura 2000 fits best into that. Like what is the difference between a “normal SPA” and a “Natura 2000 SPA”.

If your aim ist just to add the info, that this SPA was created due to/is founded by the directive, a simple natura2000=yes will do.