did anyone receive a feedback from that mapper regarding the deletions? The block message was confirmed yesterday morning. So it was clear that we ask for getting in contact.
If there is no form of response I suggest to completely revert his edits on the weekend, to prevent wasted work on tries to repair/remap the missing parts. Also the longer we wait the more conflicts we will observe when reverting.
It’s a couple of days since the message about the “big deletion”; they’ve read it and not replied or edited since, so I’ll revert changes back to and including the “big deletion”.
Edit: Now reverted. I’ve also tidied up what I can in the area (there are edits from iMekkiki2, who I presume is the same mapper, as well).
It’s likely that some of the data from iMekkiki2 and iMekkikiTH is actually useful, and some of the names could be usefully merged into the now-undeleted previous data.
As with any reverts like this, there’s also bound to be lots of extra things to fix - for example nodes and unjoined ways (where a way was joined to one duplicate which has since been deleted), so it would be really useful if local mappers could look over the area and see if there are any remaining problems.