I asked Google to ask Apple to stop blocking Chrome on Linux,
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/416620769
Thanks; but I wouldnât suggest holding your breathâŚ
Gosh, now there goes 15 years back on memory lane and itâs foggy, it used to be possible to fake the identity of the webbrowser i.e. it being Chrome but telling the visited site itâs e.g. Safari.
Finally!
We are at Cape Disappointment State Park, and all we want to know is the name of all that water we see.
https://maps.apple.com/frame?center=46.28%2C-124.09
achieves this without needing to zoom out.
(Seen on a Chromebook.)
It turns out to be an idyllic ocean,
https://maps.apple.com/place?auid=3617963108949840202
Largest ocean too, it tells us.
So⌠time to close this thread?
Firefox, as a Linux user I wouldnât touch Chrome with a 10ft barge pole
But Looking for the Pacific Ocean - #59 by Matija_Nalis already tested that and it got the same error.
So⌠time to close this thread?
True, I finally found the Pacific Ocean. But it was only in Apple Maps.
But it was only in Apple Maps.
So you werenât able to find the time to follow my suggestion from a couple of weeks ago
?
Interestingly Apple Maps are using OSM data (among other sources). Whether that separate page that meets the requirements has been much discussed elsewhere.
(obviously Iâm using Firefoxâs âUser-Agent Switcherâ add-on to get around Appleâs ridiculous browser restrictions here)
(obviously Iâm using Firefoxâs âUser-Agent Switcherâ add-on to get around Appleâs ridiculous browser restrictions here)
Oh, I think Iâll somehow manage to live without Pacific Ocean on high zooms then.
I prefer not to engage in circumventing technical protection measures set up by party actively hostile towards my intent to access their website, and instead skip dealing with them altogether.
Seems like a sensible advice generally, and especially if one prefers to avoid being classified as a criminal by a country whose leadership lately seems to be quickly steering it in the direction which historically didnât end well for people declared as the enemy of the stateâŚ
I donât think that the first statement is objective.
The majority of OSM data usage is likely from large companies like Facebook, Apple, Lyft, Uber, Amazon, etc. The standard layer is âonlyâ viewed by hundreds of millions of people a month.
The second statement makes no sense
Speaking as a former OpenStreetMap Carto maintainer, the OSMF does not have the right to dictate how OpenStreetMap Carto is designed. Someone else using the OSMFâs tile servers doesnât have a right to dictate how the tile servers are run or how the style used on them is designed.
I was just thinking that a easy solution would be anything off the west coast of North America and South America one could label the specific ocean, I mean Pacific Ocean, Iâm using voice input. Please excuse me.
Except, letâs say youâre up in the north part of the Gulf of California. Well labeling that the Pacific Ocean would be quite misleading. So I guess itâs back to the drawing board.
Iâve just written this diary entry which directly addresses this issue.


