Improving the affiliation scheme of the OSMF

[amapanda_ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ (amanda)]

@rtnf

In my own case, there is an existing “Local Chapter” with really strong online presence here. But somehow it’s not listed as the official OpenStreetMap Foundation Local Chapter.

To be “listed as an official LC” the org. needs to have signed the paperwork with the OSMF. You should ask that group why they haven’t done that.

@rtnf

In some countries, incorporation is expensive and involves a significant bureaucratic process. This may be one of the major reasons why some communities have not yet joined the LC program.

Alas, a known issue for years, and something that often affects the global south. In the past, the OSMF Board was open to paying some costs that might be needed. Perhaps ask the board about that now?

[SimonPoole]

@amapanda_ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ

You should ask that group why they haven’t done that.

See

@rtnf

But as far as I know, there is neither open membership nor democratic participation there.

I note that that doesn’t stop them from using the OSMF “logo”/name on the website.

[arnalielsewhere]

Hi all, the OSM Affiliation Models will be discussed in LCC Congress happening today. Will provide update after the discussions. Thanks! Foundation/Local Chapters/Local Chapters Congress/2024 - OpenStreetMap Wiki