Fuel tags: Improving the documentation

Taginfo currently knows almost 700 different fuel:* tags out of which only 70 are listed in the Wiki. In order to improve the documentation, some input is needed on how to interpret the tags. It would be great if we could collect information either here or on the discussion page in the Wiki.
Looking through the 200 most common, undocumented tags, they mostly fall in one of the three following categories.

There are generic terms which likely differ from region to region. Some input from the local communities is needed to check if thereā€™s any standard these tags follow:

Tag Count
fuel:gasohol* 1600
fuel:gasoline* 7000
fuel:gasolina* 200
fuel:petrol 1700
fuel:benzin* 300

Many tags contain names which are difficult to find a proper definition for, e.g.

Tag Count
fuel:diesel_A 16
fuel:diesel_B 2304
fuel:diesel_C 43
fuel:diesel_G2 1061
fuel:diesel_plus 75
fuel:euro_diesel 397
fuel:etanol_comum 970

A further large group of tags consists of brand names such as ā€œV-powerā€ or ā€œPertamaxā€. Are these defined well enough to list them in the Wiki in the description of the already existing, generic tags like fuel:octane_*?

4 Likes

Note that there are only 31 keys with more than 1,000 uses (each). So that should make the problem a bit easier.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=fuel%3A#keys

I see this as another argument that we need to improve the guidance for casual mappers - they need a simple way to tell that the ā€œGasolinium_Premium_Super_23ā€ they see on the pump is in fact just another marketing ploy for plain fuel:octane_95.

5 Likes

I would think they should only be listed something like:
ā€œExamples of brand names using these fuels are ā€œV-Powerā€, ā€œPertamaxā€ ā€¦ā€

3 Likes

Iā€™m glad the laws in the U.S. and Canada require clear labeling of the octane numbers at the pump (though according to a different formula than in Europe). In countries that donā€™t require these labels, how do mappers normally ascertain the octane numbers? By asking the attendant or cashier? Revving your engine to 600 rpm and analyzing the exhaust? :nerd_face: Or is it required to be documented somewhere online?

Is there any place where they are not shown on the pump? Iā€™d assume this will only be in a small minority of gas stations.
I wouldnā€™t expect the Octane rating to be a major issue to find out - compared to the further details like the mixing ratio with biofuels.

To add another data point: In Germany, the octane rating is not very important to most users anymore. Only 5% of the total sales are not 95 Octane. The regular user is more interested in getting fuel with either 5% or 10% of ethanol (E5, E10). All fuels are clearly marked at the pump, including Octane rating and the EU-wide norms like E10 or B7. Only special branded fuels are a bit harder to define.

To get started: Is there any place where ā€œgasolineā€ means something special?
The tag is used all across the world, sometimes combined with an octance rating. Is it safe to mark this as a duplicate of the more common octane_* tags?

Oh OK, I thought you were saying that the pumps in some country are only labeled as ā€œGasolinium Premium Super 23ā€ without an octane number. If we can assume the octane number is either uniform or uniformly posted, then we only need to explain the difference between a brand and an octane number.

I assume most of these brand names enter the database because mappers have only seen the stationā€™s monument sign from the road without going in to inspect the pump. Thatā€™s what anyone would do when visiting a place abundant in service stations, such as Gasoline Alley. In my opinion, these values arenā€™t ideal, but theyā€™re better than nothing. At least someone familiar with the brand might be able to deduce the octane number without needing to visit in person.

If it appears in combination with an octane-qualified tag, then itā€™s redundant. But if it appears alone, the mapper might be affirming that the station sells unleaded gas as opposed to or in addition to diesel fuel or biofuel. We donā€™t have as many options for some of these other fuels; mappers who must simplify ā€œDiesel #2ā€ to diesel may not realize that we expect more detail about unleaded gas.

Same thing for ā€œpetrolā€ (1621 uses).

Then thereā€™s also ā€œpropaneā€ (4027) vs ā€œlpgā€ (34287), which I think is the same thing?

LPG usually is a mixture of propane and butane. In warmer regions and seasons it can be less than 50% propane. It might be helpful to distinguish places where you are guaranteed to get pure propane suitable for low temperatures. For example, most stations in Norway are explicitly tagged fuel:propane.

2 Likes

This nuance probably isnā€™t well-known among people who map fueling stations, fuel shops, and the propane vending machines outside convenience stores (typically for cooking). Colloquially, theyā€™re all ā€œpropaneā€, though the name-suggestion-index enforces fuel:lpg=yes on some major brands of these propane vending machines. The wiki mentions some differences in composition, but laypeople probably donā€™t know anything about composition. Perhaps another note may be appropriate.

At the consumer level nobody would know precisely what the composition of the LPG on sale is: itā€™s not displayed at the pump by any retailer Iā€™ve ever heard of in North America.

Just last week I was arguing with myself what the ā€˜bestā€™ tagging solution would be for a local fuel station; I added the exact location of the pump and the (above-grade) storage tank for said fuel, and tagged them all fuel:lpg=yes instead of fuel:propane=yes. They are LPGā€”insofar as the storage tank is prominently marked with UN 1075 labelsā€”but the tank, the pump, and the totem advertising the prices are all marked ā€œpropaneā€. If you said ā€œLPGā€ to most Canadians they wouldnā€™t have a clue what youā€™re talking about.

In reality retail ā€œpropaneā€ in Canada is a mixture of at least 90% propane, maximum 5% propylene (propene), maximum 2.5% butane, and the rest ethane and other hydrocarbons (including mercaptan for odour). (This is defined in a national standard, CAN/CGSB-3.14, as ā€œGrade 1 propaneā€.) As far as I know this is generally the case in most of the USA too.

Looking at the ā€œfuel typesā€ page on the wiki, linked above, it seems I goofed and I should have tagged these as fuel:propane=yes. The user Vanagaudi added it to the table almost five years ago, with the description ā€œLiquefied Petroleum Gas, liquid mixture 95% propane and balance butane as required for recreation vehicle appliances.ā€

1 Like

Currently the Wiki states that it needs to be tagged propane if itā€™s pure, which I think is a bit problematic.
I propose to change the wording in the Wiki to something like ā€œLPG is the inclusive term for different mixtures, propane is a subtype and can be tagged instead if itā€™s guaranteed to be (almost) pure.ā€

1 Like