Foot_scale key -- any takers?

The first proponent currently AWK, the second taker threw in the towel, anybody care to take on this?

1 Like

Maybe August is not the good time for seeking volunteers.
However, having recently read the excellent and sensible tagging summary here, I must say thatā€™s a lot of work ahead just to remove the ā€˜sacā€™ of ā€˜sac_scaleā€™.

1 Like

The SAC revised their scale last year, and it now looks a a bit more like their skitouring scale, where the top degree is ā€œany fall likely fatalā€. I took the foot-scale torch from @erutan , but learned the hard way, that the talking community is not at all interested in a foot-scale in the way I understand it, starting from paved 2m wide footways, but instead in a ā€œbackwoods hiking scaleā€ instead, starting from barely a single foot wide dirt trails.

Even then though I am at odds with what the community wants, I still think a key that is not named after a third party and independently developed by them away from what is was when it was ported to openstreetmap might might serve international users better and find more uptake.

I just need to find time to go over photos, I gathered up the ones from your thread (though there are differences I need to shuffle things around in) and have some of my own to fill in the blanks, but I need to sort out a good number of them that describe different terrain etc. Itā€™s currently lacking desert, beach, and tropical examples, which I was going through my back catalog for.

User:Erutan/foot scale - OpenStreetMap Wiki is where mine is at now.

2 Likes

Recently went to some peak with a great view. Openstreetmap has a path going off of my path. I did not notice there then. Still, it has tiny Strava heat. Curiously, there is an AllTrails (true to the letter they are) route over this: Kanzelkehre - Schichthals - Kirchenspitz, Tyrol, Austria - 2 Reviews, Map | AllTrails ā€“ Quote:

I think this walk requires a new level of definition of ā€˜hardā€™ from All Trails

From having looked at the area in question from above, and the pictures on the route, Iā€™d say it is T3 terrain. Reading comments like that, I just hope foot_scale will not become a clone of sac_scale, i.e. detached from lots of peoples expectations.

I think the =path tag is bordering on useless outside of an urban area but we saw how well the proposal to carve off a bit of that went.

I managed to capture a photo with real people: A person highly attentive in their movements.

foot_scale_attentive

This is quasi urban setting: Just out of the cable car heading over to the restaurant. Seconds later I observed another person, that clearly was uneasy with that terrain. Single steps 10cm or so. I bet can be observed several times a day.

I do not see any PII troubles, so posted to File:Attentive Walking.jpg - Wikimedia Commons for your use, if merited.

1 Like