But it doesn’t to anything. The current version as shown above with the light grey broad way is okay - but not what i wanted. I feel like i am missing something here.
And i think its not a good example as the holes should not have an individual name. I think the name was just put there for the renderer, nothing else. I will edit Tag:leisure=disc_golf_course - OpenStreetMap Wiki with other examples.
I think your example is not bad at all, to be honest. But you should add leisure=disc_golf_course to the relation so it shows up in Planet DiscGolf as well properly.
Whats still up to discuss is if the tee and the basket should be included to the relation.
And i think its not a good example as the holes should not have an individual name. I think the name was just put there for the renderer, nothing else. I will edit Tag:leisure=disc_golf_course - OpenStreetMap Wiki with other examples.
I think your example is not bad at all, to be honest. But you should add leisure=disc_golf_course to the relation so it shows up in Planet DiscGolf as well properly.
Seems like i should include wrong tags in my preset. The common pitfalls like name=* and golf=* on the hole itself. Although in your example it seems every really has its own name, in that case a “bold purple” marking of the way would come across annoying i guess? But including the golf ones might be good.
I hope the “no name on hole” is in a way like if you do it on purpose its fine and if not you get reminded. But, i could add a usersettings for that as well, now that i know how to do that
Note that the only look different if you move the viewport of JOSM (so, pan up, pan down).
Either way, very strange bug.
Here is my style though: https://osm.wzh.be/josm/highway-width.mapcss
It will work best around southern Norway. As mercator drifts towards the equator it becomes more and more incorrect.