Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/645-countries-compare-2016-08-06
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-05 23:06:02+02
15 Missings und 4 kritische Multipolygone.
Gruss
walter
Without a solution, which is accepted by the majority of the community and which is enforced by the DWG, it will be impossible for us to keep this version alive. The local community of morocco is doing everything, including using socket puppets, to revert any change on “their” view of the situation. Without any word.
i.g we have dwg “support” for the current boundaries in Israel/Palestine, the crimean area and some more. Every political motivated edit may be revertet to get the actual state. If it is necessary, we’ll ask dwg. And they do help.
regards
walter
btw: did the local Mapper contact you?
So,
Step 1: We need an agreement those pro-Moroccans… first. The agreement them would either include that we can add SADR to OSM, or that they can’t delete the SADR without discussion (or both). This agreement would be via messages.
Step 2: Request opinion from the community.
Step 3: Edit with caution. Undelete the SADR.
Step 4: If a pro-Moroccan that’s not in the agreement comes and deletes the SADR without discussion… well, the community decides.
Step 5: If one pro-Moroccan in the agreement deletes the SADR again without discussion, it would be avoiding the agreement they made. Contact as many editors as you can contact.
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/646-countries-compare-2016-08-07
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-06 22:28:02+02
17 Missings und kein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/647-countries-compare-2016-08-08
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-07 20:26:02+02
26 Missings und kein kritisches Multipolygon.
Algerien hat es erwischt. Ich hoffe, dass das nicht unsere marokkanischen “Freunde” waren 
Gruss
walter
There isn’t a border in the EU relation. Why? Because the admin_level is missing.
It should be admin_level=1, according to the wiki.
@wambacher I’ll give everyone a bit more time to respond (we’re still getting replies in in dribs and drabs). I’ll probably send a reminder to some of those that haven’t replied yet that we’d like their opinion too.
Thanks. I’ll try to write down “my way”.
Is there any possibility to see the responses? don’t think so, because there are too many comm channels right now. which one do you prefer?
@wambacher Some of the respondents have requested anonymity, so the I’ll paraphrase the actual responses to try and prevent anyone being identified against their will. An email to data@osmfoundation.org is least likely to be forgotten, but other methods would work too.
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/649-countries-compare-2016-08-10
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-09 23:16:03+02
17 Missings und ein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/650-countries-compare-2016-08-11
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-10 19:18:02+02
42 Missings und kein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter
Hi Andy,
i’m really confused about Western Sahara. Some say, it’s Morocco and some say, it’s not. And i can’t decide (even for me) which is ok. 
SADC is not controlled by Morocco but it’s not a “real” country.
Solutions:
a) Morroco and Westen Sahara are split like here:
SADC is part of Western Sahara.
b) only one Morocco
This is the current OSM data
c) one Morocco without SADC
This was OSM at April 2016
I prefer solution one, because Morocco annected the ex spanish colony and that is not accepted by the UN.
On the other side, Western Sahara has been accepted by about 50 nations.
################################## CUT #################################
The current maroccanian borders (AL2) do not exclude the spanish exclaves Melilla, Ceouta ans some smaller island in the area. The Boundaries are existing (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44630799)), but they are no “inner” on Morocco, which is wrong.
And more:
The areas of Merilla and Ceuto do not include the 12NM maritime boundary, but the coastline has been used. I think, that is wrong too.
Regards
Walter
Moin,
spät, aber zumindest durchgelaufen. Hatte heute früh Rechnerprobleme
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/651-countries-compare-2016-08-12
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-11 23:42:02+02
15 Missings und drei kritische Multipolygone.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/652-countries-compare-2016-08-13
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-12 20:20:02+02
10 Missings und kein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/653-countries-compare-2016-08-14
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-14 01:06:03+02
10 Missings und ein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/654-countries-compare-2016-08-15
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-14 22:53:02+02
15 Missings und 6 kritische Multipolygone.
Die Gegend bei Neunkirchen/Erlangen hat es erwischt. Auch einige PLZ.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/655-countries-compare-2016-08-16
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-15 20:47:02+02
19 Missings und 7 kritische Multipolygone.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/656-countries-compare-2016-08-17
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-17 02:21:02+02
9 Missings und zwei kritische Multipolygone.
Gruss
walter
Moin,
hier die aktuelle Missing Boundaries-Auswertung: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/657-countries-compare-2016-08-18
Der Datenstand ist von 2016-08-18 01:33:02+02
13 Missings und kein kritisches Multipolygon.
Gruss
walter