Climbing site relation

I’m trying to do some more comprehensive tagging of climbing sites. In my area(Stavanger, Norway) I see that a site-relation is sometimes used with a sport=climbing tag. It contains the cliffs(role=crag), parking(role=parking), access paths(role=approach), etc(just an example, details differ).
To me it makes a lot of sense to bundle all data for a particular climbing site into a relation but since this is not supported by OSM doing so isn’t all that useful.
Are there similar, supported, tagging schemes that I have missed or would it make sense to update the climbing tagging guideline( to allow for climbing site relations?

1 Like