I would say that it depends quite a lot on local custom, especially on what people actually processing notes prefer. Especially if these are notes created by anonymous accounts or by accounts not fixing any issues reported by notes.
Situation is different in area where no buildings are mapped at all - there reporting “building is missing here” would be worthless and in area where nearly all are mapped and only few are missing.
It also going to depend on how many notes are there. Adding low importance notes is less fine where already there are many more important in this area and waiting for years. Then extra notes are pointless clutter.
And open ended notes about something known to be not mapped yet (such as opening note “not all shops are mapped in this city”) are sometimes closed as unspecific and pointless.
For example going to OpenStreetMap here and opening many notes “landuse is not fully mapped here” is not going to be really useful. And likely would get closed especially if multiple are opened. Anyone knows that this landuse is not mapped yet.
In the similar way opening in Poland 5 000 notes “Żabka convenience shop is missing here” would just get all of them closed. Though opening just one or two may be accepted.
Similarly, trivially detectable errors (“surface is missing for this road”) is unlikely to be considered useful and may be just closed.
if note was just unspecific “a poorly mapped entire sports area” and it was not obviously broken I would close it with request to be more specific what is broken.
makes sense as note, though it makes less sense if someone opened many such notes in area where it is a known unfinished work (maybe may be also treated as pointless note like that landuse example)
in this case someone disputed whether displacement is there, not closed note as unwanted despite reporting a problem - so it is a different reason for closure
I also seen some bad edits blindly trusting anonymous notes or closing valid notes just to close them, in some misguided inbox zero goal.
I also seen floods of pointless notes (see onosm note spam in Iran, these should be probably closed all as pointless flood).
And seen bad accounts both creating pointless/useless notes and ones mass closing valid notes.
I also seen many useful notes and opened many hopefully useful. But in the end one edit is more useful than 100 notes. We are not bottlenecked in terms of notes, adding more is of very limited utility (and I am saying that as person who opened many of them). So I would be fine with some limited silly note closing if that keeps local community happy.
And for specifically Note: 4747375 | OpenStreetMap ? Google translates gives it as “Missing sidewalks throughout the municipality” which is a borderline for me. I would not close it immediately as pointless, but if someone would do I would not protest. I would probably close it after mapping sidewalks in general area of note, interpreting it as “Missing sidewalks in this area”.
(I opened and closed many notes, and fixed many problems reported by valid notes, some of my notes were pointlessly closed and some were actually processed and helped people to improve map)
