I’m facing a dilemma: Is it better (as in, most recent, accepted and expressive standard) to use bus:lanes:forward or lanes:bus:forward in the following scenario?
|| || | ||
|| \/ bwd lane 1 || /\ fwd lane 1, vehicle+bus | /\ fwd lane 2, bus ||
|| || | ||
My best solution so far is
highway=...
lanes=3
lanes:forward=2
lanes:backward=1
bus:lanes:forward=yes|designated
And since the outer-most lane later develops into a full-fledged bus stop with a platform, I tag that next segment with bus_bay=right
.
Is this correct and expressive enough?
Thanks in advance!
I virtually never used lanes:bus
because that lacks the position of bus lanes and it’s always better to be explicit about this.
On that aside, I wouldn’t use bus_bay
over bus:lanes
for when a bus stop exists because the lane still continues in that situation, it doesn’t suddenly disappear, just because a bus stop is nearby. It’s basically the difference between parking=lane
and parking_street=side
i.e. the former takes a lane away from the road, the latter takes form of cutting into kerb (among other things) or between a double-tracked railway and a passing loop using railway analogy.
1 Like
Thank you, the railway analogy sure helps! So bus_bay
has no place in this context because we already have a full-fledged bus lane and it’s not just carved into the side of the lane.
Regarding the lanes, I think I’ll stick with bus:lanes
instead of lanes:bus
.
Thank you for your answer!