Momenteel staat in de © OpenStreetMap contributors pagina:
Netherlands: Contains © AND data, 2007 (www.and.com)
Helaas is de website www.and.com nu in handen van een of andere crypto NFT domein scalper.
Het lijkt mij dus dat deze link verwijderd of aangepast moet worden.
Wat denken jullie dat de beste aanpak is? Alleen de link verwijderen, de link/attribution bijwerken, of iets anders?
Volgends deze wiki pagina, heet het bedrijf nu GeoJunxion.
Gewoon de link verwijderen en even melden op de talk-page. De link is extra bovenop de naamsvermelding.
Hoi Taya,
Wat Jeroen zegt lijkt me het volledigst. Goed dat je het even hebt nagelopen. Je wil niet dat mensen op wazige of niet-relevante pagina’s terechtkomen.
IIRC the problem is is that the OSMF is contractually required to provide the text and the link, and nobody from AND has been reachable to authorise changing it. See somewhere deep in the LWG minutes (and the LWG are likely the people the DWG should be talking to).
Even ter info: de dag nadat ik dit gepost had, heb ik het ook op de GitHub gemeld, waar al een issue over de website link bestond.
It’s creating another dependency, but what about pointing a link to an older Waybackmachine version of the site like https://web.archive.org/web/20200120030354/https://www.and.com/
So just change the URI to non-linking text (or better yet have the LWG conclude that and do it). I could be mistaken, but I’m not seeing a requirement to actually use a hyperlink in the CC-BY license — in fact, in print you can’t even use a hyperlink. As long as the URI is repeated verbatim (but as plain text instead of using a <a>-tag in HTML) it seems fine.
@Sander_H Not allowed by the license. The URI must remain as-is if it is present. However…
@SimonPoole Which version of CC-BY-SA is this even about? This cannot have been version 4.0 which was published after this import. This means that it is not required to provide the URI, if it no longer contains any information on the license (and in case of version 1.0, not required at all).
Is there any kind of written contract/agreement?
No. The digital maps donated by AND Automotive Navigation Data are available under CC-BY-SA.
They were one of the organisations contacted during the licence change and the agreement reached then would be what is relevant. With other words Michael Collinson probably knows (any CC BY-SA version is fundamentally incompatible with the ODbL).