For example wikipedia tags linking nonexisting articles or entries about humans (that typically are invalid, sometimes retaggable to subject:wikipedia) and so on.
If you are interested in specific area - let me know by sending a message or posting here and I will add it (right now report for Belarus is being generated)
If any report is bogus, false positive, invalid or otherwise problematic: also please let me know!
Nikšić - Wikidata links wikipedia pages in both Cyrillic and Latin alphabets.
Linked node has wikipedia=sr:Nikšić which translates to https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikšić which actually works in web browser (but redirects automatically to preferred Serbian wiki page in Cyrillic transliteration https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%88%D0%B8%D1%9B, e.g. Никшић — Википедија)
It would be best if someone from those communities might jump in, but as far as I recall, they actually use both Cyrillic and Latin scripts, but with former being preferred (but I could be wrong).
I have no idea how Wikipedia handles the issue, though, apart from the fact that web page loads, after Page and Discussion links there is a dropdown selector to choose preferred transliteration (which changes &variant=sr to variant=sr-el or variant=sr-ec in URL).
But if human readable web interfaces automatically redirects to transliterated page, shouldn’t it be possible for your script to detect that redirection too and handle it?
Yes, but apparently neither https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/sr:Nikšić?uselang=en nor API redirects. I can skip this specific report in this specific area until I figure out what is going on (I will likely wait until other issues are fixed there before investigating)
Only this region (and Hamburg) are enabled. I will enable more once reports for this one is empty or someone expresses interest in other specific region. Are you interested?
It is done this way as architecture of processing is still not very smart (but got significantly improved recently) and I am running this on my laptop.
Maybe you could tweak the wikipedia wikidata missmatch validator. See this item for example. It links to a specific chapter of a wikipedia page. Wikidata does not allow linking items to anchors, but I don‘t see a problem from the OSM perspective. I think you should exclude links with a # from the list.
Maybe you could tweak the wikipedia wikidata missmatch validator. See this item for example. It links to a specific chapter of a wikipedia page. Wikidata does not allow linking items to anchors, but I don‘t see a problem from the OSM perspective. I think you should exclude links with a # from the list.
agreed, in general we should try
to avoid the perception that the wikidata tag has to correspond to the wikidata of the wikipedia tag, this was true only at the starting point of wikidata.