Sorry, but I will not pick up this app. There are thousands of OSM-based apps, so I have to filter here.
One of the most important criteria is that the software can capture and/or modify OSM data.
I donât see that here.
Greetings
walter
btw: may be iâll remove some old stuff, which does not fit the requirements any more.
Walter a couple of things seem broken in the posting: the âOSM Software Watchlistâ link goes nowhere, there is debug about at the and (and yes Vespucci 18.1 is missing).
Nope, our convention (since half a decade) is that the 4th digit indicates beta versions with 0 being a release. We would have very much liked to have used an alphanumeric combination for that, but there is at least one app store that only accepts digits and dots in version strings.
PS: semantic versioning conventions only apply to the 1st three numeric fields in any case. and the âpre-releaseâ flag is set on github for beta releases and tags, so there is no actual danger of confusion.
Nope, our convention (since half a decade) is that the 4th digit indicates beta versions with 0 being a release.
We would have very much liked to have used an alphanumeric combination for that, but there is at least one app store that only accepts digits and dots in version strings.
many developers donât know or even donât care
PS: semantic versioning conventions only apply to the 1st three numeric fields in any case. and the âpre-releaseâ flag is set on github for beta releases and tags, so there is no actual danger of confusion.