on a random basis: yes
And the majority of those you changed did not have a typo. It usually just had a different meaning than what is documented in the wiki.
I’m used to other users asking the local community before changing such supposed typos. Then it might have been noticed sooner that there is a completely different problem in the data than a supposed typo.
Nobody would ask you to check over 14,000 entries to see if they match the description in the wiki.
But with the still manageable number of entries that you have edited, you should have checked whether they are pavilions on or near sports grounds and therefore correspond to the wiki description. And by then at the latest you would have realised that there is much more inconsistency than just a typo. At the latest then you should have asked the local community.