Thanks Robert for the help on posting the links. I’ll look for that.
Could not get those links you posted to work, however I am not a programmer, so I wojuldn’t understand them anyway.
Thanks also for your insight. I agree, when classification is done, the OSM rules should apply above ant routing consideration. However sometimes, as you say, there is a certain amount of “interpretation” that has to be done in cases where the rules are not specific enough. On some roads, the classification could go either way. And if, in the opinion of local people who know the roads, the applied classification might be causing problems with routing, then a re-classification might be appropriate IMO. And if routing programs take even a small consideration of classification into account, a re-classification of a small section of the road might be enough, added to the other calculations, to make it select a faster route. Just a matter of fine-tuning, I guess. That’s what’s great about OSM. The input of local people.