I have an area that’s currently tagged as natural=wood, with leaf_type=mixed. In reality it’s a disused/abandoned cherry orchard, but it’s still mostly comprised of cherry trees.
Should this be tagged with a lifecycle prefix like disused:landuse=orchard? I’m not completely sure if it’s disused or abandoned since it is fairly overgrown but the trees still bear fruit. If it’s tagged like this, do I tag the tree type with trees=cherry_trees or taxon=…?
As a geographic feature it just matters that it’s a wooded area, but it’s very distinct from the local oak, ash, birch, etc.
If it is overgrown and non- orchard scrub and trees are growing there then I would tag it as disused even if the old orchard trees are still bearing fruit.
I should’ve clarified, the fruit is no longer harvested and access tracks have been removed. I suppose it’s more abandoned than disused in that you’d need to clear new tracks and remove fallen trees and undergrowth before it could be used again. But it’s definitely natural=wood rather than scrub.