That post was actually trying to make a point in this thread actually, although I wouldn’t object if it was moved.
The point I was trying to make here was that:
- As described, “landuse proposal V2” really didn’t make any sense.
- That it had been debated before, ad nasueam, and hadn’t won over the support of mappers
- That this didn’t mean that I was opposed to any changes, just ones that didn’t add any value.