contact:city is fine with me. Let’s go with that. Thanks!
I agree. Ideally our tagging scheme would allow for an arbitrary number of alternate address city names. Even if many addresses do have one definitive city name, I’ve seen too many counter examples where multiple different city names are in use and none of them can really be considered incorrect.
Some thoughts along these same lines from last year:
1 Like
And then there are cases where the “postal city” is dissected into two municipalities
For example, Thornhill, which is cut right down the middle by the City of Vaughan and Markham, with people from both sides referring to their area as “Thornhill”