Yes, it is a delicate balance between importing and errors. On the other hand, OSM is often full of errors, mainly for areas that were edited a long time ago when satellite imagery had coarser resolution and larger errors in “location”. I do not suggest we should simply import things we know are very incorrect, but things such as landuse will always have a certain degree of ambiguity and it will be up to each editor what they consider is a suitable selection of landuse category (and so on).
What is “our standards” exactly? Is there a standard? How accurate must the satellite data or gps traces be?
