Should sidewalks and crossings be unnamed?

I created a thread asking what problems a specific name on a specific pavement was creating, and we got four problems:

  1. When a footway has a name, routers will announce that name instead of the type of footway, which is more relevant in some circumstances.
  2. Renderers will render the name of the sidewalk in addition to the name of the roadway, which creates visual clutter.
  3. Ways that could be attributed to more than one road (e.g. at intersections) cannot be tagged with more than one name.
  4. Adding the name to the highway way as well as the sidewalk way duplicates data in the map.

I did this to challenge my own opinion, which is that since the sidewalk is part of the road, and the road has a name, the sidewalk also has a name - and the way you tag things with names in OSM is with name=*.

I am not convinced any of these reasons trump that essential logic.

3 Likes