Satellite imagery corruption?

I generally use ESRI World Imagery satellite map because of its sharp details when zoomed in. However, for the past couple of days, the imagery is now a mix of ESRI and Bing. I’ve tried reloading and switching to a different editor, but the imagery is still as I described.
sample

The lower right quadrant is Bing imagery and the other three quadrants is ESRI imagery. I don’t like Bing at all because the “clouds” block the details even at the outer zoom levels.

Without the location, it is difficult to be sure, but the only possible satellite imagery on that screen shot is the bottom right corner.

All providers have a limited choice of satellite imagery providers (NASA and ESA, probably), so their satellite imagery is likely to look much the same.

Also, the cut off is not on tile boundaries, which indicates the change was made upstream of breaking it into tiles, which again suggests this is something that ESRI has done.

(The bulk of the imagery will be from aircraft, which will be more variable, as there are potentially more providers of that, but even then it is possible that both ESRI and Bing buy in images from third parties.

It is possible that a third party supplier has objected to the OSM use of their aerial imagery and that was used on the bottom right.

Location is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/39.4605/-77.9917&layers=N

What you see is pure aerial images from ESRI. Bing has sharp images in this area.

Bing does not. See the following Bing image:
Bing

The following is ESRI:
ESRI

ESRI used to be clear and detailed probably about 3 days ago. Now it is identical to Bing. Bing always produced “clouds” at this zoom level. ESRI never had any clouds at all. This is making my editing impossible.

Yes, I could go with one of the others, but only ESRI had the detail I needed.

This is the url for the image in question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=18/39.46029/-77.98655

My mistake.

At a low zoomlevel Bing and ESRI have identical images:

Never used to be that way. In the images I provided in the previous post I had used ESRI to add a couple details from the satellite image (along the lower edge left hand building and the lower right edge a park and on the upper right corner I had added a historical district). Now, ESRI totally obscures those images.

Just to confirm, I went to the ArcGIS site to see if it is the same there. It is. So it is not on your end. It is on theirs. I’m totally bummed out because I was still adding details to buildings and stuff around my area (Martinsburg, WV).

Just poking around other satellite image sites I came across https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ Any way of adding these to OSM?

No:

You must not use it as a source for OSM even when accessing it directly from the usgs.gov site.

That’s a pain. I didn’t know that Google had exclusive rights to it. I just thought it was another public domain site.

I still would love to see that kind of detail when working with extreme zoomed in images. Makes outlining areas so much easier.

@hadw: It seems to me you wanted to comment here, but instead you reported last comment for moderation :slight_smile: :

Oops! :frowning:

Thanks for putting it in the right place!

Maybe this was true sometime ago, but nowadays this is not 100% true, in some areas where I collaborate new features are visible on aerial imagery available to OSM, and the imagery available in GMaps is one or two years older.

(my fault, I refer only about the age of the imagery, not about the need to survey on the ground)

I’ve sent a complaint through ESRI feedback since it is their problem.

“complaint”? I suspect you misunderstand the nature of the arrangement. ESRI is kind enough to allow us to use their imagery for tracing, this required ESRI to invest quite a lot of work to go back to their suppliers and determine if such use would be in order.

So please don’t “complain” to ESRI, pointing out an issue that hey might not be aware of, is naturally quite OK:

I apologize. I have a problem where “complaining” and “pointing out an issue” are identical.

I am relieved to see that I’m not the only one experiencing this problem with Esri imagery. I’ve been using it extensively shortly after I started mapping in October, and now in my area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/39.2643/-85.8830), the Esri imagery has switched to being identical to the Bing imagery.

I got an answer from my feedback. ESRI still has the old imagery. This is the blog of their update: https://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2018/01/10/whats-new-in-world-imagery-basemap-january-2018/

In that blog, they state that they still have the pre-update imagery. If OSM can access the pre-update imagery, that would be extremely helpful. See https://arcgis-content.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1&layers=ab399b847323487dba26809bf11ea91a

NO CLOUDS!!!

Thank you for finding this out! A little more info: https://arcgis-content.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=ab399b847323487dba26809bf11ea91a

I’d just use this as a custom background in iD, if I knew the tile URL scheme…

EDIT: Figured it out for iD. This is the scheme for a custom background using Esri World Imagery (Clarity): https://clarity.maptiles.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}

Please don’t directly access third party map tiles, even when some versions are available officially for OSM. It is possible that only the officially available ones are actually licensed for OSM. even if the ones you are using were previously licensed.