The changesets discussed above relating to boulders, glacial lakes, plate boundaries, salterns, and rock shelters have been reverted.
Around here Blockgletscher are always tagged natural=scree
, because that is what people like you and me see there, both on aerial and on the ground. Iād say, that is fine. There should not be a natural=glacier
required, the appearance does not fit and the geologists seem to approve, from what I read from casual reading up subject matter.
This is an interesting point that would be good to discuss in the Glacier:type=rock vs geological=rock_glacier thread.
Letās pick up the topic there!
@Kai_Johnson sorry for what happened about your contributions. I need to clarify that Iām not Krako73 as stated by eyasonu here who certainly is a sock-puppet, according his recent account with 0 edits. Furthermore, sorry to be off-topic but when people talk behind my back I feel the need to intervene.
@eyasonu 0 edits in your account, another sock-puppet AKA tomolobla AKA Capslock_Cleaner AKA grawutayette AKA ltwo AKA Kugelbaum etcā¦ How coward to conceal yourself behind several accounts and even behind other people in trying to convince them to report me, as woodpeck says. I know by fact that you tried to convince Nanard777, but too bad for you, he revealed me your scheme. I know him from our community meetings in Belgium. I met him personally again, we had a nice beer and we talked about your vandalism.
@woodpeck Iām open to listen about what do you mean by āproblematic mapping habitsā.
For the pseudo āad-hominemā attacks, again, they were not ad-hominem attacks. You conveniently say they are so. Read the definition and apply!
For an unbiased point of view https://chat.openai.com/share/7a837294-f4bb-4b07-a34a-a27d3dfc6e92 My comments in CS with evidneces or fixme=tomolobla user did this, explanation + you were complimenting his edits!
No, chatGPT is not a good way to decide on this. For multiple reasons.
And it is definitely not unbiased.
And even if chatGP would be reliable and not biased, then the same cannot be assume for description you wrote.