Road Route Relations

misabrzi · 2012-08-05T11:48:13.000Z

kmilos:

Btw, maybe the following can help too:

http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/serbia_main_and_regional_road.pdf

I was thinking the same

Oh and one more thing, just to illustrate reliability of different sources http://www.geosrbija.rs/rga/default.aspx?gui=1&lang=3&minX=7545729.4108714&minY=4777564.2247739&maxX=7595664.211563&maxY=4815739.0180561&layers=220%20221&baselayer=100003&visibleOLOverlays=, here you can see same road marked as E80#E752 M25, witch is obviously outdated.

SunCobalt · 2012-08-05T11:54:36.000Z

misabrzi:

That article is referring to http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/serbia_main_and_regional_road.pdf as source (here is JPG version of the same http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4853/mapaputeva.jpg). There you can see part of E-80 between Niš and Priština overlaps with E-771, so all wiki articles that say E-771 end in Priština, probably uses same source. Even though this map comes from official site it might be outdated or simply incorrect in some parts.

Ok, lets end it where it is. We can correct it if there are mot up to date or reliable information

misabrzi:

And something else I noticed, in ref tags, numbers and letters are separated by space. On our wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia#Broj.C4.8Dane_ref.3D.2A_oznake there are no spaces in names but on English E road wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Europe/E-road_network#Tags_for_the_relation there are spaces.

I know but the number of possibilities is probably limited to E-123, E123 and E 123. If everything is in the right relation, than it is not problem in my eyes…But I can fix it if there is standard for Serbia agreed here.

misabrzi:

Further more it says E # ref is assigned to relation not to road, and I saw roads with E number on them selves, is this correct or should be changed.

It can also be tagged on the road with int_ref= but you are right, ref= should be the local number.

misabrzi · 2012-08-05T12:11:13.000Z

SunCobalt:

misabrzi:

That article is referring to http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/serbia_main_and_regional_road.pdf as source (here is JPG version of the same http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4853/mapaputeva.jpg). There you can see part of E-80 between Niš and Priština overlaps with E-771, so all wiki articles that say E-771 end in Priština, probably uses same source. Even though this map comes from official site it might be outdated or simply incorrect in some parts.

Ok, lets end it where it is. We can correct it if there are mot up to date or reliable information

misabrzi:

And something else I noticed, in ref tags, numbers and letters are separated by space. On our wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia#Broj.C4.8Dane_ref.3D.2A_oznake there are no spaces in names but on English E road wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Europe/E-road_network#Tags_for_the_relation there are spaces.

I know but the number of possibilities is probably limited to E-123, E123 and E 123. If everything is in the right relation, than it is not problem in my eyes…But I can fix it if there is standard for Serbia agreed here.

misabrzi:

Further more it says E # ref is assigned to relation not to road, and I saw roads with E number on them selves, is this correct or should be changed.

It can also be tagged on the road with int_ref= but you are right, ref= should be the local number.

I think we haven’t agreed (yet) on standard markings for E roads, and since we already have relations for major road and you are building it for regional roads, this might be something to put on a To do list and discuss it later. And ref also, so I’ll leave it as it is .

misabrzi · 2012-08-05T12:26:03.000Z

I just found one more source http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/ECE-TRANS-SC1-384e.pdf (E 771 on page 26).
And I’m looking at some examples around Europe and tag combinations are int_ref= for E roads and ref= for national, so this looks ok.

kmilos · 2012-08-07T10:40:26.000Z

SunCobalt:

Are you fine with the suggested tags for the routes? If I touch the E-roads then it is only a small step to create the srb:national/regional road relations at the same time.

Just a quick ‘2 pare’ :

Seems there is precedent for alpha-2 country code here [1] (uppercase please as prescribed by ISO 3166), and also to keep with the ‘official’ classification [2] maybe we should choose something like

RS:class_I
RS:class_II

although the ‘popular’ classification

RS:national
RS:regional

will work just as well…

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Route#Road_routes
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highways_in_Serbia

SunCobalt · 2012-08-07T20:06:06.000Z

whatever you want. Class I&II would be a better description of the Serbian classifications, national/regional/motoways would be more generic. There is no standard yet in OSM (Germany has no network=, except BAB->Bundesautobahn=Federal motorway, which I think is a mess…a german acronym in an international project). Personally I prefer national/regional/motorways because it is a step forward to an OSM standard and people not familar with Serbian (or Poland or Japan…)specific classifications, will find such generic classes easier and will not need to find the classes for each country individually.

mpele · 2012-08-10T06:59:51.000Z

У мају ове године је урађена реорганизација категоризације државних путева.
Законски је регулисана са Уредбом и Правилником:
http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/regulativa/uredba_o_kategorizaciji_puteva.pdf
http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/regulativa/pravilnik_objavljen_u_sl_glasniku_rs_broj_50_2012_od_18.05.2012.pdf

У правилнику између осталог стоји:

Član 26.
Podaci iz Evidencije su javni i dostupni su svim korisnicima pod istim uslovima.

Pedja · 2012-08-10T20:51:42.000Z

Po našem zakonu dokumenti državnih ustanova ne mogu piti predmet autorskog prava, počev od zakona i podzakonskih akata pa sve do kartografskih podataka.

mpele · 2012-08-11T06:40:20.000Z

Јесте да се удаљавамо од теме, али по ком закону документи државних установа не могу бити предмет ауторског права??? И како дефинишу документ?

Pedja · 2012-08-12T09:20:36.000Z

Из Закона о ауторским и сродним правима:

Члан 6

Ауторскоправном заштитом нису обухваћене опште идеје, начела, принципи и упутства који су
садржани у ауторском делу.
Не сматрају се ауторским делом:
закони, подзаконски акти и други прописи;
службени материјали државних органа и органа који обављају јавну функцију;
службени преводи прописа и службених материјала државних органа и органа који обављају
јавну функцију;
поднесци и други акти у управном или судском поступку.

mpele · 2012-08-14T07:03:33.000Z

Pedja:

Из Закона о ауторским и сродним правима:Члан 6

Не видим да на основу овог закона да можемо да извучемо неку корист

Него да се вратимо на тему. Који су подаци потребни за креирање релација, односно за њихову проверу? Ако сам добро разумео то су правац и његова дужина?

http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=49&lang=sr

На горњем линку се може наћи статистика бројања саобраћаја, односно неке деонице (можда су и све) и њихове дужине. Ајд да се пресаберемо шта нам је потребно па да им то и тражимо.

kmilos · 2012-08-18T14:51:00.000Z

FYI, just made a new wiki page listing the road route relations (only international so far): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/Road_network

P.S. Went ahead and did the E65 split all over, took me a couple of days

SunCobalt · 2012-08-18T19:14:02.000Z

the tool OSMonitor is installed. The import is under way. Pawel, the coder of the tool, and I are bit megalomaniac and trying to import the whole planet and keep it current with OSM replication…let’s see. The tool will provide daily reports like this
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ppawel/PolandMajorRoads

However, we need some help for the setup. We need files like these https://github.com/ppawel/osmonitor/tree/master/data/road_refs
i.e. text files for M-roads, E-roads and R-roads with the numbers in it.

mpele · 2012-08-18T21:13:48.000Z

I am not sure but I think that there is no more R and M roads.
http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/pdf/regulativa/uredba_o_kategorizaciji_puteva.pdf

I have found some discussion on forum http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1168459&page=129 , but right now I am not able to study it.

mpele · 2012-08-18T21:20:29.000Z

The number of roads are simply the numbers:

1-6 for IA category
11-36 for IB category
100-181 for II category

SunCobalt · 2012-08-19T06:40:07.000Z

mpele:

The number of roads are simply the numbers:

1-6 for IA category
11-36 for IB category
100-181 for II category

not sure I understand. These numbers replace the existing R and M numbers or are just an additional numbering schema? But even if there is a new road numbering, I suggest to start with the old M and R numbers and move to the new schema if it becomes more clear. We also could run reports for both shemas

mpele · 2012-08-19T08:35:30.000Z

This isn’t only numbering schema - it is totally different concept of road network in Serbia.

Look at the map: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=92155474&postcount=2583

There are a lot of critics about it, but it is the only official categorization.

kmilos · 2012-08-19T10:24:42.000Z

Any evidence of road signs being replaced already?

Just thinking we should maybe not rush with the work until they are…

mpele · 2012-08-19T11:46:00.000Z

The old numbering schema was active for more than 35 years and transition could not be achieved over night - AMSS is still using the old schema.
Look at those links:

http://www.amss.org.rs/index.php?option=com_google&view=standard&id=4&Itemid=181

http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2860:130812-radovi-na-drzavnom-putu-ii-reda-broj-128-deonica-golubovac-donji-milanovac&catid=34:odrzavanje&Itemid=1632&lang=sr
http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2824:090812-obustava-saobrajaca-na-drzavnom-putu-ii-reda-r-267-ugrinovci-dobanovacka-petlja&catid=26:obustave-saobracaja&Itemid=1584&lang=sr
http://www.putevi-srbije.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2817:080812-drzavni-put-ib-reda-broj-21-m-19-deonica-debrc-misar&catid=26:obustave-saobracaja&Itemid=1581&lang=sr

http://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/245/Servisne+vesti/1158734/Saobraćaj+pojačanog+intenziteta.html

SunCobalt · 2012-09-15T16:49:37.000Z

The M-roads are now in a good shape except M9.1 (missing part in Kosovo), M21.1 (missing part in south Central Serbia), M22.9 (does not exist in reality). The length information come from Wikipedia.rs and I am not sure how outdate the informations are.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMonitor/Serbia_Major_Roads
When the new schema becomes more clear, we can run statistics for it also.