RFC: hiking_exposure key (along with hiking_technique this disambiguates sac_scale)

[erutan]

@SimonPoole

My main problem with this proposal is that it is for no good reason activity specific, why can’t it just be “exposure”

@erutan

Somewhere in this thread it was decided that path_fall_risk is more accurate than hiking_exposure

Someone from Australia came in and was expecting exposure to be exposure to the elements (so lack of tree shade etc). It’s a somewhat mountaineery term so fall_risk seemed more straightforward as a suffix and moving the prefix to path solves this issue as mountain bikers etc face the same exposure.

update: see RFC: hiking_visibility key 🍿 paired with hiking_technique and hiking_exposure/fall_risk this rounds out the hiking path trinity - #3 by erutan