@stevea,@ZeLonewolf and others members, I believe we agree and have already reached the same consensus. The current proposal or similar ones that involve not only additions, but changes to keys with massive use and deprecation of many others, is currently unfeasible due to the way OSM works.
We would then have 2 ways to make the most of our time committed to this (I hope I’m not being too simplistic but rather realistic).
We continue with the content of this proposal with regard to covering information that is currently not possible, meaning the addition of values and keys.
This way we cover more information, there are no conflicts with the current way of mapping, and at most it satisfies the request to organize the content.
The other approach, I quote
Based on what I said, do you agree, disagree, or propose something else?