Problem with vandalism and 2 DWG members

This is extremely long and links several additional materials, first linked document starts from “1 June 2021 at 19:28”.

Have you considered summarizing it into something shorter and less taxing on potential reviewers?

“we were only allowed to edit places surveyed recently. Good, my sole wish was a fair resolution. It didn’t happen that way at all! Even though I provided proof I had been on terrain, I got blocked again”

Have you tried to provide a single specific case where it applies and is currently applicable? And where no additional important context is applicable?

that is frankly pattern matching to previous complaints that I have seen that turned out to be completely baseless, and does not match my experience with this people. I can be convinced that it actually applies here, but it would need to be fairly persuasive.

1 Like