But how is a moderator supposed to enforce something if there is no clear rule for it?
I can tell you from years of moderation that there is a standard pattern:
- Someone is out of line e.g. nowadays he might start a campaign trying to convince everybody that corona is just a lie, or that the republic of Germany does not exist
- Moderator asks him to stop, politely
- Someone refuses to stop as there is no explicit rule stating that he can’t spread conspiracy theories
- … loop as needed …
- Eventually moderator removes offensive content and bans him
- Someone attacks moderator in personal mails or publicly in the wiki, claiming willful moderation, personal suppression etc., threatens escalation and complaint with admins
That’s what makes moderation so much fun.
Clear rules from the start help a lot.