In Hawaii and other US states that have public beaches, there are often marked paths to the beach that go between private property. These paths are marked by the state and are public right of ways. Many of them do NOT have any any amenities. They are simply a small path from the side of the road to the beach. Here is an example of a path marked by the yellow sign and blue sign.
We have these in Rhode Island, they’re called Shoreline Public Access. highway=path + access=public are always appropriate here. Definitely interested to learn if anyone has other tagging to add to these cases.
footway=link is for footways that don’t actually exist – they’re used for routing purposes to indicate things like “you can cross from the sidewalk to the parking aisle” or “the sidewalk ends; now you need to walk along the side of the road”.
Thanks for the help. I’m maily wondering about mapping these locations. Almost like tagging highway=trailhead, but for a beach access. Or is tagging the path enough? Many of these trails are a only few hundred feet and end on the beach.
Thanks all. Does anyone think mapping the signs as nodes is much of a benefit? The government data I found looks like it would be pretty easy to import and verify from street level imagery.
My answer above (mapping the traffic sign nodes) was presuming you already had some kind of use for the data in mind. If you can’t think of any reason to record where each sign is, (e.g. to make a map highlighting all such beach accesses) then you can skip it
Should be access=yes (although access being allowed is the default and not really necessary). A blanket access=yes is often incorrect since that technically also includes cars, etc…