I belong to a cyclists association in Milan, Italy and I started to map cycleways in the city and around it.
I read the wiki and some post about the general rules that apply when tagging but I have still many questions.
Roads and streets in town usually have a pavement. Many cycleways are on pavements here in Milan. Usually a part of the pavement is for bikes and the other one for pedestrians.
I didn’t find any indications in the wiki about tags to mark a road that has a pavement. Often here in Milan cycleways are on the pavement but they’re not visible from the road because in between there are cars parked:
_______ street
\ \ \ \ \ cars parked
_______ pavement with cycleway and part for pedestrians
Should I trace a new track or tag the existing road?
a road can be tagged with more than one “highway” tag? I mean a road that is already tagged as tertiary can be tagged as highway=cycleway too?
sometimes cycleways (opposite track) go from one side of the road to the other through a zebra crossing. How should I tag this?
I would tag that using a highway=[streettype] for the street and one highway=cycleway for the cycleway (+ maybe foot=yes). The car parking can be mapped using both ways and combining them into a closed area and add amenity=parking to that area.
No.
Use cycleway=opposite then add a crossing= tag + bicycle=yes on the crossing node and cycleway=track for the normal situation.
I think it should be the other way around: In principle parking on streets is permitted unless forbidden. The best approach would be to add parking=no to a road or parking=paid when there are paid places available. Also opens the option of day_of_week etc.