Klasifikacija cest

Communities Slovenija (Slovenia)
1

Bolj ko pregledujem zemljevid naše države, vedno manj mi je jasno kako se določa klasifikacijo glavnih cest (primary, secondary, tertiary).

Če upoštevamo osmwiki in uredbo o kategorizaciji državnih cest, bi morale biti ceste Glavne 1. reda (1-11) & 2. reda (1xx) primary, regionalke 1. reda (2xx) & 2. reda (4xx) secondary ter regionalke 3. reda (6xx, 7xx, 9xx) tertiary. Vendar opažam, da se tega v velikem obsegu ne upošteva (predvsem pri cestah regionalkah je zmeda in so nekatere 6xx klasificirane kot secondary, ter nekatere lokalne ceste brez državne klasifikacije/številke so klasificirane kot tertiary).

  1. Rešitev - začenjamo upoštevati osmwiki (lokalne ceste brez državne klasifikacije/številke morajo biti unclassified)

  2. Rešitev - sprememba:

    Moj predlog za poenostavitev:

  • da se glavne ceste 1. & 2. reda in regionalke 1. & 2. reda vse postanejo primary
  • regionalke 3. reda postanejo secondary
  • tertiary se uporablja za lokalne občinske ceste za katere se presodi da povezujejo neka glavna območja (kot se v nekaterih primerih že uporablja)

Prosim še za kakšen komentar ali idejo.

2

Hi!

I have to admit that part of this mess was caused by me - mainly inner-city roads in Ljubljana. I retagged a couple of roads by function rather than official classification.

Ljubljana

  • Large main roads connecting the city centre with the obvoznica: primary. (Dunajska, Štajerska, Šmartinska, Zaloška, Dolenjska, Barjanska, Tržaška, Celovška)
  • City centre ring: primary
  • Other large main roads: secondary
  • Roads that “drain” traffic from a neighbourhood to a main road: tertiary.

Before I did this, there were very few tertiary and not many primary roads. I felt the was lost potential for differentiation because the full classification spectrum offered by OSM was only sparsely made use of.

I guess it comes down to the question “What’s the main purpose of the road classification?”. I was working under the assumption that the main application is routing. But there are probably other purposes which can be argued to be just as important (for which a strict 1:1 mapping from official classification may be better suited).

2 Likes
3

I think cities are a completely different topic - I am more interested in roads outside cities (maybe I should state that in my first post). As you say - yes first of all is routing and I agree with that, but national classification is kinda how roads should be used, you really don’t want people using a road which cannot support large traffic.

As for the cities I think that is not a problem we know that some streets are more important than the others and that classification is fine in my opinion.

2 Likes
4

Great. I didn’t mess around outside cities as far as I remember. :slight_smile: