It is building:levels=2 or building:levels=0 + roof:levels=2.
Note, that the upper point of normal level (where people can live) can be lower, than upper point of building. And the difference is usually equals namely roof:height.
I think in such manner:
if there are N levels (both building’s levels and roof’s levels), we should write building:levels=N or building:levels=K and roof:levels=M (N=K+M, because roof:levels is “number of floors within the roof, which are not already counted in building:levels=*”).
if height of roof is 2 meters, we can write roof:height=2 (if there is also level in the roof, we can also write roof:level= ).
So if building has 1 level and roof with height 2 meters, it is correct to write building:levels=1 + roof:height=2. And exact height of all building in this case is “average height of level”*“number of levels” + “height of roof”.
Algorithm “we think, that height=building:levels*3” is wrong, because it doesn’t take into account, that building can have roof with height, but without level!
Kendzi 3D v242 doesn’t work with wall=no and building=roof.
Why did you remove old post? Why not to add new content to new post?
I start think that it is not so bad idea. But in general you should avoid mixing level tag and height tag. So it should be “forbidden” to describe min height using meters and max height using levels. Same with roof:height.
If we assume that roof:heigh will be added to height generated by level tag it will complicate drawing windows little bit…
tags wall=no and building=roof are not supported currently. I added ticket.
Finally I manage to clean up stright skeleton algorithm implementation for holes in polygons and I would like to introduce automatic hipped roof, very similar to F4.
Additionally if roof type should not be detected automatically it is possible to use roof types:
square hipped – for classical roof on square like base
complex hipped – for skeleton algorithm
hipped – automatically switch between square and complex as described here
Of course roof type 9.0 is still working.
There may still be some problems with it, so please report them.
Does Kendzi3D plugin work properly now? It crashed at my computer some time ago, but I decided, that it is local bug in my computer, but just right now one our college wrote me, that he also had problems with Kendzi3D plugin.
My problems: I go to settings in JOSM, mark kendzi3d, kendzi3d-jogl and log4, press “OK”, restart JOSM. Go to “3D” - Kendzi3D View - nothing happens. I mark “autostart” and restart JOSM, in this situation I see a sign like “trying to load kendzi3d, it is impossible, do you want to disable kendzi3d?”. The sign is exact, because I write here translation to English (I see sign at my local language).
Our college has sign “Your security settings have blocked an untrusted application”, when trying to start kendzi3d plugin. He tried to decrease security level of Java, but kendzi3d doesn’t work.
In there was change in JOSM api in version 7575. I adjusted plug-in in the release 1.0.180. Please check if you have that version installed, if not update it. You can do it by Menu > Edit > Preferences > Tab Plugins > Button “Download list” > Select kendzi3d plug-in from list > Button “Update plugins”
If it won’t help please send PM with console output as described here.
I hope, this plugIn can make 3D mapping more comfortable.
Of course, this is not the end of the develping:
More features should be realized in the next months.
Thanks for the user Kendzi for support and the company Elektrobit for financial powering of this development.
By the way: I spoke at the SOTM 2014 about S3DB 2.0.
The description in Wiki comes soon.
Improved Kendzi 3D should support these elements.
I hope everybody of you will have more fun with the work work with S3DB 2.0 because of more flexibility in 3D modeling with.
Is it possible that the roof:orientation:across/along is not working good?
When I use I see in Kendzi 3D view along in F4 map as across .
When I use along I see in Kendzi 3D view across F4 map as along.
I think that Kendzi 3D view is wrong? Or are there other tag that overrule it?
When I use Kendzi 3D view height it is written with a “,” comma example “height 3,5” josm validation asks a “.” dot where can I change it ?
The roof orientation tag is working correctly only for rectangle like buildings. When shape of building is close to square it may work unpredictable. So I need some example to check if it is working right.
Should not happen. Do you edit height by 3d editor right? I added bug request.