Inconsistent tagging for pilgrim centers

Hi ! While working on

support for pilgrimage routes (Gudbrandsdalsleden, St. Olavsleden,

Kystpilegrimsleden, Tunsbergleden, and others), I’ve found a specific

data issue in OSM that you folks might be interested in looking into, or

perhaps you know someone in the broader tagging community who is working on it.

The problem: pilgrim centers—the places where you get your

pilgrim passport (Pilegrimspass/credencial) stamped—currently lack consistent

tagging. I’ve checked well-known centers such as the Oslo Pilgrim Center,

Granavollen, Hamar, Dale-Gudbrand, Dovrefjell, Stiklestad, Avaldsnes,

Bergen, and Smøla (regional centers), and found a mix of:

- tourism=information + information=office (without any

pilgrim-specific sub-tags)

- simply building=office

- simply guideposts

- (internationally, e.g., the Camino) office=company

Without a stable, unambiguous tag, it is not possible to build a reliable

searchable category for this—a name-based search would mostly

return guideposts, and including all `information=office` entries would

bring up general tourist offices.

Proposed tagging convention I would like to see considered:

1. For the pilgrimage center/stamp office itself: tourism=information +

information=office, plus a new or more consistently used sub-tag,

such as network=pilgrim or pilgrimage=stamp_office, as well as

operator=. This makes it possible to

filter precisely without including regular tourist offices.

  1. For pilgrim-related accommodations (hostels, youth hostels associated
    with a route): a corresponding network=<route_name> tag on
    tourism=hostel/guest_house nodes, in the same way that DNT cabins
    are already tagged with network affiliation in Norway. This makes
    pilgrim accommodations distinguishable from ordinary accommodations without
    relying on the name text.

This is not a problem unique to Norway—the same shortcoming is found on
the Camino and likely on the Via Francigena—so it may also be worth
raising this issue more broadly within the international tagging community,

I hope that a suitable rules of tagging are implemented ASAP, so this can be used by navigation apps.

It is now fixed,- since I did not get any reply I did it like this:

1 Like