the following overpass-turbo-request
gives back 40 meg results. And if we look at the graphical output - its a tremendous huge output… with approx 30 k dots
[out:json][timeout:250];
{{geocodeArea:Germany}}->.searchArea;
nwr[amenity=school][!"isced:level"](area.searchArea);
out geom;
question: how to reduce the output - to approx 10 Percent - how to rewrite the request!?
i need to have the result - to illustrate some data - but with so many dots in the image - it gets quite hard to understand.
look forward to hear from you
aTarom
(aTarom)
2
Try with the xml format and only show the centroids of each element instead of their geometries
[out:xml][timeout:120];
{{geocodeArea:Germany}};
nwr[amenity=school][!"isced:level"](area);
out center qt;
You should use Umap for clustering. Guides seem oudated. uMap/Guide/Import data with Overpass - OpenStreetMap Wiki
- Copy the link from “raw data directly from Overpass API” in “export”
- Create a new layer in Umap
- Change layer type from “default” to “clustered” near the top
- In “Remote data” below, paste the link in url, and change data type to OSM
Unfortunately, Overpass Ultra doesn’t seem to have addSource exposed to set cluster: true= , required for clustering. That allows varying circle-color and circle-radius with step and [get, point_count] .
aTarom
(aTarom)
6
Try with regex
[out:xml][timeout:120];
{{geocodeArea:Germany}};
nwr[amenity=school][!"isced:level"][name~"^(Y|Z)"](area);
out center qt;
thank you very much . - this is great help!
Hi there - dear Kovoschiz
many thanks for the reply. I will have a closer look on all that.
btw:
[out:json][timeout:250];
{{geocodeArea:Germany}}->.searchArea;
nwr[amenity=school][!"isced:level"](area.searchArea);
out geom;
what if i run a request that just looks for the only schools that are named with “Y” or
Z.
in other words: i have to create a request that only looks for schools - that has the name that starts with “Y” or “Z”
Ypsilon-school
Yblahla-school
Ytablo-School
Zeuss-school
Zepelin-school
and so on and so forth
well how to ceate a request that does look for those ones!
sure thing - the amount of data would be quiete only be smaller.
ideas, thoughts - critics!
look forward to hear from you