On the wiki for piers it states: “Small piers tagged as open ways way are often rendered too large, giving an incorrect impression of the distance between piers.”
and
“For a narrow pier draw a linear way way and add man_made=pier.
For a wider pier create a closed area area and add man_made=pier and area=yes.”
So it’s a little unclear as to which I should do for smaller piers, I’ve been mapping them as areas for now, but I don’t want to be inconsistent with what the rest of the community is doing. Advice would be helpful. Thanks!
Do not take what you can find on the Wiki as absolute truth, it is written by people without a formal process.
The text is not illogical to me but if you have detailed information I see no problem also mapping a more narrow pier as area, it is just a way of more detailed mapping.
Don’t be afraid to draw small piers as areas. Some have irregular shapes that cannot be mapped with a single way, such as those shaped like a T or a P; generally, to represent these types of piers, mappers add a second way, which gives the false impression that there is a second or third pier for a single element.
I don’t think it really matters what way you map them. That said, like the difference between a simple footway and a pedestrian plaza, area=yes can be used to create something much wider, like Way: Brighton Pier (3451897) | OpenStreetMap - something like this, I would only maps as an area.
Mapped as way: OpenStreetMap - something like this, I would only maps as a way.
Mapped as way: OpenStreetMap
Mapped as area: OpenStreetMap - with these two, even though some of the piers are close together, there is no difficulty discerning one from the other.
Important: many things that are called “piers” are not piers, but breakwaters, quays or similar objects. The important part is that the water can flow under a pier. One definition is that a pier is “a bridge into the sea”. Notably, sometimes piers float on the surface of the water, they aren’t supported by the sea bed. ![]()
This is a pier: OpenStreetMap
This is a breakwater: OpenStreetMap
These are quays: OpenStreetMap
Both are pretty common:
Overpass search for piers mapped as closed ways.
Overpass search for piers mapped as lines.
And formal processes on wiki are often resulting in output of even worse quality
I rewrote page a bit deleting some misleading claims and moving some to extra section to indicate their lesser importance if any.
Is it now less confusing?
I just took a look and it’s much more clear. Appreciate your help!
And thanks for reporting your confusion on forum! Please do it again if you encounter something similar.
Wiki can be useful but it is sadly having a lot of dubious content like this.
(it was not so bad, because it was clearly confusing - and sometimes you have understandable and clear but altogether wrong descriptions)
It’s totally fine to map a T or P shaped pier as two separate ways if that’s required. Any data consumer that assumes that there must only be one OSM way element for a pier and uses that as the basis of some calculations is flawed.