Adamant1
(Adamant1)
5
The reason I wanted to a see a link to the area is because there’s the “One feature one OSM element” standard. So if it’s one consistent field that just happens to have a fence in the middle of it then it’s probably better to map it as a single area. If the fenced off area’s are distinct “elements” though, then it’s fine to map them separately. Really it’s probably fine to map them separately anyway. Since at the end of the day it really doesn’t matter. Except some software won’t show that there’s a fence, which can throw things off because then it will look like two distinct fields when that’s not what it is, but most people don’t seem to follow the One feature one OSM element thing anyway. So it’s not a super huge deal how you map it either way and regardless of what the specific technicalities might be.