common in Southern California are sidewalks that appear to be wheelchair accessible but suddenly and without warning the sidewalk suddenly drops to street-level with a gap of about 1.5 meters. The gap has curbs on both sides of the space. I can provide photos if someone will tell me how. This is a known serious hazard and is a fallrisk.
I’m from So Cal (although I’ve lived in the Bay Area for almost 30 years). I don’t recall seeing this type of sidewalk construction. What city?
Although we can’t use it for mapping, for illustration purposes, the easiest way is to just provide a link to a Google Streetview image showing it.
Here are two G Streetmap images: Google Maps
As a first attempt, I would map this as a barrier=kerb, kerb=raised as two nearby nodes in the locations where the curb interrupts the sidewalk
Thanks.
I’d also break the footpath, then add the kerbs as Jarek said. Wouldn’t hurt to also map a drain coming from up the hill out to the road!
& what are the brick “steps”? Is that used as an access path to somewhere?
You can embed images in this forum’s posts. I use it on my phone, it is the a button in the bottom right corner below the text box. It might look different on a bigger screen.
The sidewalk ways should have the standard highway=footway + footway=sidewalk tags.
The curb nodes should have the standard barrier=kerb + kerb=raised + tactile_paving=no tags - this is the most important part.
The in-between segment way (if you even go to the level of detail of splitting it out) should be a highway=footway of some kind (not footway=crossing) - though whether “unrefined”, as footway=sidewalk, as footway=link, as footway=path…? I’m not sure.
I see you’ve hedged about whether to even split out a separate way, and I’d tend to agree. From the perspective of a pedestrian, this isn’t so different than a gap in the sidewalk that the road crew dug up and forgot to put back together. (It happens.) If we do split it out as a separate way, I agree that footway=crossing would be misleading, since there’s no crossing traffic to watch for. Those bricks do resemble steps leading down to the street, but that alone doesn’t make a crossing. More importantly, the starting assumption is that this gap exists for drainage purposes. Map the drain, and then I guess this would be a case for ford=yes, though renderers will be prone to overstating the ford’s prominence.
Thank you everyone for the advice. When my changes / edits appear on the live OSM I will try to post a link here and request comments.
The changes are “live” when you submit them. (Sometimes rendering them in some layers takes longer.)
Thwy are here: Changesets by dwl-sdca | OpenStreetMap
In this change you seem to have created a new short sidewalk overlapping but not connected to the other sidewalk, which is unlikely to be correct.
Thank you for the new sidewalk comment. I think that I now have it so that the sidewalk renders correctly.
