I would argue that this falls squarely under the automated editing guidelines, and that anyone that wants to use AI agents for mapping purposes first needs to get community agreement to do so.
It is good to say PUBLICLY that it is good to comment on problematic edits PUBLICLY.
In cases that are less obvious than this one, if someone writes to DWG saying “I have told this person numerous times that they are making a mistake”, and if this “numerous times” happened via personal email, OSM direct messages, Telegram, forum private messages or anything, then DWG (and the rest of the community) cannot see what has been communicated. However, if it is obvious for everyone to see that the user in question has ignored many comments, we can act immediately.