Discussion: Move Page 'Wheelchair routing' (Misleading Title & Outdated Content)

General talk
, ,
1

This is being posted here for further visibility and discussion after making this post on the Wheelchair Routing talk page.

The current title, Wheelchair routing, is misleadingly general because this page is dedicated almost entirely to a single, regional project—the rollstuhlrouting.de initiative by the Heidelberg GIScience Research Group.

This title is confusing for two main reasons:

  1. Specific Project Focus: The core of the content details the requirements (e.g., DIN 18024-1 parameters) and data collection efforts for a routing service only available in Germany.

  2. Outdated/Contested Tagging: The page documents an older, specific set of tags (like sidewalk:left:sloped_curb:start=*, etc.) that the page itself explicitly warns ‘are not the usual process’ and are ‘particularly controversial.’ This content, along with the visible ‘Warning! Info here is heavily outdated in places!’ banner, makes it unsuitable as a general resource.

The existence of general sections (e.g., the standard wheelchair=\* tag) alongside this project-specific information further confuses the article’s purpose.

I propose moving the page to a more specific, project-focused title, such as:

I would then suggest that we create a new, clean page at the general title Wheelchair Routing. This new page would serve as a global resource, collecting up-to-date information on:

  • Standard, globally-accepted tags for accessibility (like wheelchair=\*, ramp=\*).
  • Existing, working global routing and mapping tools for wheelchair users (e.g., Wheelmap.org).
  • Best practices for mappers on how to tag and map for wheelchair specific routing along with specific considerations about wheelchair navigation that non-wheelchair users may not take into account without being specifically informed.
4 Likes
2

I think that in this case page may be simply moved, posting on talk page and waiting say a week would be far more than enough. I would likely just move it on encountering such case.

I would move to Wheelchair Routing Portal (rollstuhlrouting.de) as it is not doing weird things with domain name

Or are you asking because you either are unsure how to move it or have not enough edits on OSM Wiki to be permitted to move pages?

BTW, http://www.rollstuhlrouting.de is not loading for me.

1 Like
3

Nope, done some moves before for Sustrans stuff, just posting for visibility and so the community can discuss the issue without me making a change unilaterally. I don’t wanna break something or move something this old without giving an opportunity for discussion.

Me neither, I want to get in touch with their department and talk to them after the move to overhaul the whole page as there are a few broken links and alike. It’s why I suggested a name not dependant on the domain name in case that domain is permanently offline. Maybe Wheelchair Routing Portal (Heidelberg GIScience Department)

4

Moving pages always carries some risk of breaking inbound links, but in this case, I think your suggested move will be perfectly understandable. Still, as a courtesy, use the “What links here” tool to review and update any inbound links and redirects on the wiki itself. Then, if you’re still concerned about people landing on the new page from an external site or bookmark, you can add an {{about}} header to the top of the page for disambiguation.

2 Likes