Thank you, lutz for the link the “historic place” map. This is very interesting and another meritious project.
But in fact it seemes as if my original question mainly ended in missunderstandings.
My point for this question was neither “historic places” with a certain national or international historical/heritage importance nor structures for a historical map like buildings which do not exist any more at all.
I have tried to talk and to find a solution for:
- ruins of buildings without a bigger historical/heritage meaning
- structures which clearly exist at the ground today
In a number of regions of this world (like some parts of DR Congo or Nagory Karabakh or Syria) we can find complete former settlements with dozends or even hundreds of ruins. I think that this is something that we should me if we “run into” it.
As explained in my last posting i will prefer building= ruins in this case
added by abandoned:landuse=residental and abandoned:place=village
if there are complete former villages which were left or “wiped out”.